Much of what is in this bill seemed OK, but also seemed redundant to existing laws. Parts of it seemed completely unnecessary and intentionally vague.
New traffic offenses should be created to address real problems faced by the public or law enforcement. The items in this bill seemed unnecessary and vague, leaving them open to interpretation and potential abuse by law enforcement.
HB 1022:
Electric Window Tinting - this is expensive and uncommon. The state already has thresholds for allowed tinting levels, why does it matter if it can be turned on and off electronically. No reference to any testimony suggesting this is a problem was mentioned in the floor debate, making it a solution in search of a problem.
License Plate Electric Tinting - The already existing line in the code directly above where this would be inserted reads: "No license plate shall be covered with any material unless the material is colorless and transparent. That would seem to already cover this.
Sentencing for Evading Law Enforcement based on Distance Traveled - makes no sense if you think about it. Someone traveling 110 mph for half a mile in a crowded city street is far more dangerous than someone who leads police on a chase for 10 miles at 65mph on a country road.
This bill received overwhelming bipartisan support in the House vote. I voted "No" along with mostly Republican members. The Senate did not take up the bill.
